The
diagram below is schematic in nature, such that all
distances are left unspecified. It depicts a
realistic case pertinent to the final phase of the
Lae-to-Howland flight. An offset heading has
been prescribed by Fred Noonan to the left of course as
a conventional strategy for mitigating navigation
errors.
- The offset direction (left) was
chosen to intercept the closer arm of the 157/337 LOP.
- The offset angle would be chosen to
assure that the maximum navigational error to the
right brings the Electra directly into the gathering range at Howland,
wherein RDF homing in cooperation with Itasca
would become functional.
The most extreme navigation error to
the left is shown missing the gathering
range. However,
upon reaching the sun line-of-position, Amelia
Earhart would be advised by Fred Noonan to turn with
confidence to the right and onto a
course of 157 degrees. The expectation --
indeed, as it turned out, only the hope --
would be that eventually the Electra would come within
gathering range and
successfully complete the flight using RDF.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d90c0/d90c03428b0d693223b6b30b872bea66b6259633" alt=""
Solvers will observe that even with
perfectly functional RDF equipment and people for both
modes of RDF, Amelia Earhart and
Fred Noonan would be deprived of advanced knowledge
that RDF will be operable upon arrival -- that outside
the gathering range, whether RDF will ever become
operable would not be known.
Solvers
of
Wages of Flight will be
keenly aware that while approaching Howland Island, the Electra was getting low
on fuel. The offset for landfall navigating, of
course, exacerbates the need for endurance
aloft. The plane would be slowed to extend time
aloft, but that also puts final maneuvers into slow
motion and increases psychological pressures on the
two aviators who have already been flying for more
than 20 hours and would now be earnestly gazing at the
Pacific waters ahead looking for any sign of Howland
or the Itasca.
For our solution, then, we offer the
following answers to the question in the puzzle:
"What could
possibly go wrong?"
1.
Fred Noonan offsets the heading to the
north. By
happenstance, cumulative navigation
errors turn out to be near the extreme
left of the direct course (green line),
taking the flight outside the gathering range.
At the ETA
for the 157/337 LOP,
Noonan calls for a turn toward the south
onto a heading of 157 degrees.
2
After some -- substantial -- period of time
Amelia Earhart concludes that the flight
should be inside the gathering range, but gets no joy on the
radio. Both Fred Noonan and Amelia
Earhart are unaware that, because of
multiple critical
issues, no gathering range exists at Howland Island.
3. Amelia Earhart concludes
that Fred Noonan's landfall offset was to
the wrong side -- that the gathering range and Howland lies to the
north. As
pilot-in-command, Amelia Earhart decides
to reverse direction to 337 degrees
and flies toward the north, away from
Howland until fuel exhaustion.
|
As we know now, RDF did not work for the
flight. In the final stages of the search for
Howland, the Electra was flying in clear skies at
1,000 feet, scanning the horizon for Itasca
with a smoke stack of, say, 40 feet above the
waterline. The
visibility limit was 47 miles using this
formula...
Visibility
Limit = (2 R h1 + h12)1/2 + (2 R h2 + h22)1/2,
where…
R = radius of the earth,
h1 =
altitude of the Electra, and
h2 =
height of Itasca.
Rejection by Earhart of
Noonan's final heading is
controversial. But not
unprecedented...
Nearly
a month earlier, on June 8, 1937, Amelia Earhart's
round-the-world flight crossed the Atlantic Ocean,
departing Natal at the eastern tip of Brazil, with
Dakar at the tip of the Cape Verde Peninsula as its
destination. The Bendix RDF on board the Electra
was known not to be working, so Fred Noonan
had to rely on sun-shots and dead reckoning for
navigation, using the drift
meter for cross-course corrections.
Noonan offset the prescribed heading 4o to the left of the direct course from Natal
to Dakar, a distance of 1,400 miles. At that
distance, the nominal landfall intersection with the
coast of Africa would be displaced less than 100
miles. Upon arrival over the coast of Africa,
landfall navigation called for a turn to the
south. However, not able to confirm charted
objects on the coast-line, Earhart decided to turn
north instead.
Long
described the result this way (p.143)...
"As it turned out, it was the wrong
direction but the right decision."
In 20 minutes, they landed -- not at
Dakar -- but at St. Louis in French West Africa, 120
miles north of Dakar. No such outcome was
possible on July 2, 1937.
The puzzles in
the Amelianna
Collection do not make
use of information from flights prior to July
2, 1937.
|
|