Romance
                      in Numbers
                 
                 
                Copyright © MCMXCVII by Paul
                    Niquette.  All
                    rights reserved. 
              
             | 
          
        
      
    
    
mazing,
        is it not, that Roman numerals have so many uses in the sciences
        despite
        a functional obsolescence in the face of the 'positional
        notation' afforded
        by Arabic numerals (see Prolix).
There
        prevails in Roman numerals an undeniable cumbersomeness, and yet
        these ancient cyphers continue century after century to be
        printed on pages
        and chiseled on stones.
    
    
      Some benighted souls will dismiss the matter as
        mere
        romance. Now really, does the word 'mere' ever belong in front
        of 'romance'?
    
    The sophisticated solver of this
        puzzle
      will recall that there are seven Roman symbols -- I, V, X, L, C,
      D, M,
      standing, respectively, for 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1,000 in the
      Arabic
      numeral system. As fifth-graders used to be taught, you cannot
      simply read
      a string of Roman numerals from left to right and translate them
      into Arabic.
      There are rules to learn:
    
      - 
        A symbol placed after another of equal or
          greater value adds
          its value.
 
      - 
        A symbol placed before one of greater value
          subtracts its
          value.
 
    
    Only certain combinations are permitted. Not all 49
      possible
      pairs of Roman numerals get applied: VV, LL, DD, for example, give
      way
      to X, C, M.
    The expression 'greater value' in the subtraction
        rule
        is also limited -- you will not find VL or IL for 45 and 49, VC
        or IC for
        95 and 99, VD or ID for 495 and 499, VM or IM for 995 and 999.
    
    
      For their advocates, Roman numerals may provide a
        'Roman
        holiday' -- a time of enjoyment derived from the suffering of
        others.
    
    
he
      bars in the chart on the right represent the length in number of
      symbols
      required to represent the corresponding Arabic number in Roman
      numerals.
      In the range of one to a hundred, all but one of those numbers can
      be expressed
      in Arabic with only two symbols. Observations...
    
      - 
        The longest Roman numeral represents Arabic 88
          with eight
          symbols -- LXXXVIII.
 
      - 
        Four require seven symbols -- 38, 78, 83, 87.
 
      - 
        The most popular symbol is -- surprise -- X not
          I, with 150
          versus 140 incidents.
 
      - 
        The least popular, of course, is C, with 11
          incidents between
          one and a hundred.
 
      - 
        Both V and L appeared 50 times each in the
          100-count series.
 
      
      A total of 401 symbols are required to enumerate
        100
        items -- twice the number that you would need using Arabic
        notation. Only
        50% efficient, one might say. But hey, that's nothing. Try
        converting the
        population of the world to Roman numerals:
      
        5,123,456,789 would require 5,123,456 Ms
            followed by DCCLXXXIX.
      
    
    
      Almost forgot: 
          
        What year in
              history required the largest number of Roman numerals to
              express?
            
       
    
    
      
    
    Epilog: 
        For a puzzle that creates a new classification of numbers, see Reaman
          Numeral.