Copyright ©2009 by Paul Niquette. All rights reserved.
is supposed to be fast -- faster, certainly, than
other modes of
transportation. "Faster the better," we say.
Flight has been
optimized for fast. The Jet Age sure did give us
faster ways to get
from where we are to where we want to be. The Jet
Age did such a
good job of it that for many journeys, flight has become
practical mode of public transportation, displacing
trains and buses and
ships. Fast has its costs, though...
Energy Consumption and Environmental Damage.The world is gradually becoming sensitized to both of these matters in all realms of human activity. Saving energy and protecting the environment have emerged as international priorities. Whereas new technologies are needed -- hoped for! -- conservation appears to be the most practical mitigation for the near term and beyond. One thing must be clear to everybody: Flight cannot benefit directly from many promising new technologies: fission and fusion, geothermal and solar-thermal, hydroelectricity and tides, hybrids and photovoltaics -- least of all wind. Meanwhile, the wheels seem to be coming off of the biofuels bandwagon...
...a severe set-back for alternative aviation fuels. Conservation, then, is key. "Going green" means giving up what flight does best. "Faster the better" won't -- well, fly.
|After pushing back from the gate,
taxiing to the runway,
and waiting in line for departure, an aircraft must
conduct three fundamental
phases of flight:  take-off and ascend to cruising
altitude, for terrain
avoidance and favorable winds,  cruise in level
flight, preferably along the most
direct route, and  descend for the approach to
Flight routinely uses maximum allowable
power -- pushing
envelope -- for all three phases, even flying in
a shallow power-dive
during descent top-of-the-green,
all of which, of course, consumes the most fuel.
Flight will do all
of that to optimize for fast.
GO TO SOLUTION PAGE