he
expression
A - B has, under our initial assumption, a
precise value:
zero.
The step that says, "Dividing both sides by A - B"
means "Dividing
by zero." Just about everyone knows that
dividing any finite
number by zero results in an quotient of
infinity --
a value sometimes described as "undefined" (although
"increasing without
bounds" may be more appropriate). Division by zero
is not, in any true mathematical sense, forbidden. It is
a natural consequence
of formulating any ratio in which the denominator can
vanish to zero.
An ideal vertical line has an infinite
'slope,' resulting
from innocently dividing any part of its length by the
corresponding horizontal
distance, which is, of course, zero.
The situation in Double
Integrity
is a whole lot more interesting. Dating back to
antiquity and some unknown
originator, this paradox exemplifies mathematical monkey
business at its
best.
Or worst.
The two expressions we are dividing by zero
are
(A
+ B)(A - B) and B(A-B). Each has a
coefficient of A - B
and therefore a precise value: zero.
The sophisticated solver knows that
dividing zero
by zero results in a quotient of --
well, . The "undefined" has
become "definable at
will" ("increasing -- or decreasing -- without
limit").
It is easy to imagine practical
applications: mathematically
proving to a lender, for example, that you can repay
your debt with half
of what is owed or convincing a cashier to give you
change for a dollar
bill in the amount of $2.
Epilog
As discovered in the solution
to Fermat's
Really Last Theorem, here is a more promising
stratagem for mathematical
monkey business...
A = B
A2/2 = B2/2
( A2 )1/2=
( B1/2 )2
|
No reason, just letting A
= B.
Since 2/2 = 1, nothing changes.
Factoring each side differently. |
( -12 )1/2=
( -11/2 )2
( +1 )1/2
= ( i
)2
+1 = -1
|
No reason, just letting A
= B = -1.
Oops, right side went imaginary.
By definition, i 2
=
-1. |
So, that buck I owed
you? Well, pay up.
|