ne
astonishing factoid about numbers is that the decimal ciphers are not equally
represented among the most significant digits (see Benford's
Law). The bar-chart below summarizes the percentages of readily
computed integers in which each decimal cipher appears as the most significant
digit:
Sophisticated solvers will notice something
there.
The bars represent the percentages enjoyed by each decimal
cipher as the most significant digit in populations of 90 computed integers
(as indexed from n = 0, 1, 2, ... 89). What the heck
is going on with those factorials?
n
going all the way from n = 1 to n = 89, wherein...
89! = 16,507,955,160,908,461,081,216,919,262,453,619,
309,839,666,236,496,541,854,913,520,707,833,171,034,
378,509,739,399,912,570,787,600,662,729,080,382,999,
756,800,000,000,000,000,000,000
...the cipher does not appear even
once
as the most significant digit.
Factorials
are
simply the products of consecutive integers, 1 times 2 times 3 times...
up to some number n symbolized as n!
That's not an exclamatory statement. The "!" was introduced
in the early 19th century by the mathematician Christian Kamp and is pronounced
"factorial." By the way, expansion of n! is most often
put the other way around: n! = n(n
- 1)(n - 2)(n - 3)...3, 2, 1. A "factoid"
is something else.
Factorials do become humongous fast. Consider the
number of possible sequences you can deal after shuffling a deck of cards...
52! = 80,658,175,170,943,878,571,660,636,856,403,
766,975,289,505,440,883,277,824,000,000,000,000
...that's 8 bidecabillion permutations. Moreover, to
reach a googol, all you need
is a mere 70!
In the late 18th century, a Scottish mathematician, James
Stirling, unable to find batteries for his calculator, developed an approximation
for factorials...
n! ~ (2 n)1/2
(n / e)n
Thus, the product of the first n integers gets a formula
a whole lot jazzier than that for the sum of the first
n
integers...
S(n) = n(n
+ 1)/2
Hey, the sum of the first
n
integers
does not even have a name.
Until now...Totorial.
As for a symbol, "&" might
work ...
n& = n(n
+
1)/2
...so that 36& = 666, pronounced
"36 totorial."
Christian Kamp would be pleased, don't you think? |
eanwhile,
however huge n! gets, it does not
seem to get a most
significant digit of as shown above.
|
Will that hold true for all factorials?
|
{Solution}

|